Saturday, July 29, 2006

Movie Review: Little Miss Sunshine

When it comes to comedies, Sundance has crowned both the deserving and the undeserving. Truly off-beat fare like Bottle Rocket and Napoleon Dynamite are among the deserving diamonds plucked from the indie rough. Little Miss Sunshine however, is experiencing more irrational exuberance than Happy, Texas.

Immured in a Volkswagon of indie quirkiness, this movie piles on coincidence and cliche in lieu of character development or plot. It is paint-by-numbers screenwriting, directing and even acting at its smug indie worst. From the contrived initial set-up that puts a dysfunctional family in a van on their way to a pre-teen beauty pageant to the dance number that makes them functional again, it is nothing more than a collection of rehashed, soul-less japes and eccentricities of character that add up to a big pile of movie mush.

Did I mention that I'm the only one who seems to hate this movie? Read on for a spoiler-filled list of why you too should hate this movie, and the few moments that are exceptions.

Continue reading about Little Miss Sunshine (major spoilers)...

1. Steve Carrell is not a convicing suicide or Proust scholar. We've seen manic comedians play restraint. When Robin Williams did it in One Hour Photo it was all kinds of creepy. Carrell's conversion to living seems to happen and unhappen as the plot needs it. As for his being a Proust scholar, apparently we are meant to be convinced by his yelling, "I'm a pre-eminent Proust scholar!" every time he pushes the van. You know in your heart that he's a Proust scholar because a) it's quirky and b) it lets him give that speech at the end.

2. Ditto Paul Dano's character's Nietzche obsession, which disappears after two minutes of quirky character establishment. Let's allow for a moment that he wouldn't have realized he was colorblind for fifteen years -- why were there eye-test brochures in an Emergency Room waiting room? Hello screenwriting of convenience! You know where there are eye-test brochures? At an optometrist, that's where.

3. Abigail Breslin I will admit is pretty good. It's kind of sad when she can act circles around Alan Arkin and Toni Collette and Greg Kinnear. Her moment where she convinces her brother to come back with just a hug is the movie's only sappy moment that earns its sap. As the character in whose arc the whole plot is invested, you'd think that we'd get a moment to see her decide it was okay she lost the competition. Doesn't happen.

4. Toni Collette and Greg Kinnear live in a nice house in Albuquerque but they "can't afford to fly" Olive to California for the weekend? It's called a mortgage. They let you take out more than one. The set-up for this movie, which takes most of the first act, is so contrived I'm going to have to stop myself from writing an essay going into every nuance of contrivance. a) Assuming that they really couldn't afford to fly and that driving a gas-chugging van is really that much cheaper, why -- other than to make the plot happen -- does everyone need to go along. May I suggest: Grandpa wants to go because he coached her. Mom doesn't trust grandpa to be responsible. Dad sees the drive as an opportunity to stop at Scottsdale. Steve Carrell's character can't be left alone. And what about Paul Dano's quirkily mute Dwayne? Leave him. Or make him a party animal instead of a mute so he can't be trusted not to wreck the house while he's gone. With some basic motivational re-alignment the script becomes believable -- at least until...

5. WEEKEND AT BERNIES. Are you kidding me? Are you really kidding me? Only the Coen Brothers could pull something like this off. I might say it was worth it for the line, "He's in the trunk of our car" but even that line has to be set up by a contrived question.

6. Contrived meeting of Carrell and his nemesis and former lover while he is buying porn in a town none of them live in. 'Nuff said.

7. The filmmakers think porn is so funny, they bring it back a second time when the cop pulls them over. Greg Kinnear's convenient freakout leads into the discovery and, hilarity, there's gay porn mixed in, which makes the cop beat a hasty retreat. Oh homophobia, let us mock you gently rather than taking you seriously.

8. Minor point, but when was the last time you got chocolate ice cream "a la mode"? This is mainly an example of how the husband/wife directors are striving way too hard for quirkiness on even the smallest level.

9. All the great Shakespeare comedies end in a big dance number. It makes the audience feel great about what they just saw. When it is unearned, as it is here, it's just petty manipulation. How convenient that there is a scary Latino man to cheer for them when the time is comically ripe. Olive's dance is hard to see as funny after the creepy real contestants we've just witnessed, who are selling pre-pubescent sex appeal just as overtly.

10. The van. What a metaphor for this movie. Painted the movie's theme color of yellow, breaking down at all the plot-convenient times, with a horn that's stuck on obvious and annoying.

First-time screenwriter Michael Arndt got paid $250,000 for this screenplay, which I reckon is about $249,999.32 more than what the paper it is printed on is worth. Of course I have to mean that facetiously, since the movie was purchased by a major distributor and is going to make a lot of people a lot of money. As baffled as I am by how the movie got made in the first place, I'm more baffled by the enormous positive response this celluloid sham is evoking. Are we in that much need of indie quirk that any old quirk will do? If you haven't seen this movie yet (you must really like spoilers), ask yourself this: Do I want to see a movie about a dysfunctional family taking a roadtrip in a VW van to take a daughter to a beauty pageant? Is there any way such a story can be executed so as not to have ten cliches per page? Is there any way the journey could be worth the inevitable outcome. You don't know the disappointment I felt in the theater last night when I realized where this movie was going. After you visualize what's coming in Little Miss Sunshine, you realize there are more laughs in Triumph of the Will. And that's something only Nietzche could appreciate.


25 Comments:

On Sun Aug 06, 02:38:00 AM PDT, Anonymous Anonymous articulated the following...

Your points are valid, but you're missing the forest for the trees. Yes, there are flaws, but the movie comes together as a fast-action, slapstick comedy, reflecting the lunacy and love in many American families. It may not hold up over time, but it's a well done comedy for today. We need films like this to help keep us sane in a world which seems perpetually on the edge of spinning madly out of control any second.

 
On Mon Aug 07, 08:29:00 PM PDT, Anonymous Joel articulated the following...

Forget the yellow bus. I can't believe movie tickets in Manhattan cost $11. It's a good thing my girfriend buys the tickets for both of us. This movie is fun when it's for free (free for me, that is.)

 
On Wed Sep 06, 01:10:00 PM PDT, Anonymous Anonymous articulated the following...

I saw the movie this past Sunday, and I thought it was great. I really enjoyed the blending of dark, sarcastic, and slapstick humor with the feel-good moments that were there. I don't agree with a lot of your points about why the trip shouldn't have had to have been taken in the van...I think tanks of gas and two overnight motel stays are still cheaper than round-trip flights for 6.

It's strange. I really enjoyed Bottle Rocket, but I haven't even seen Napolean Dynamite because the trailer turned me off. I should see it, but even then I'm afraid my preconceived notions might kill the movie for me. I don't know...I think a lot of people, myself included, need to drop the elitist attitudes and just try to enjoy things.

 
On Wed Sep 06, 05:44:00 PM PDT, Blogger J. Ott articulated the following...

Anonymous #2,

We're talking about round trip flights for two. Plus I lay out above a simple way to still make it logical for all the characters to take the bus.

As for your accusation of elitism for not liking this film... meh. I'm not going to apologize for having high standards. I went in expecting to see a clever, funny movie and I was disappointed.

I know that puts me on the wrong side of most people's opinions about this movie -- but I'm sticking to my gut reaction.

I agree that the end to the story is and should be happy. Do I think it was earned? No, I don't. Is it filling a need? Obviously, it is. I just wish a better film was fulfilling America's feel-good movie jones.

 
On Fri Oct 06, 05:50:00 PM PDT, Anonymous Anonymous articulated the following...

I really hate to just list all your points and my contradictory opinions, but if you have the audacity to criticise cliche's then count off your fingers as you pick up on every little niggle you have with the film then I'm gonna have to.

1. Steve Carell is a perfectly convincing Scholar, he even has a beard, and he is a also convincingly recovering from a suicide attempt - he even shows off his wrist bandages by rolling his sleeves up. I don't want to hear quote after quote to convince me that someone is a scholar. His character arc depends on his ability to go back to his family - his sister especially - and renew his childhood relationships - moving on from his scholarly life which has so depressed him.

2. Dwayne's Neitzsche obsession is manifested in the same way all teenage obsessions with philosophy are, through posters and buttons and only getting through the first third of a book. If anything bugged me about the idea it was that Dwayne had been mute for 9 months, usually that knid of teenage obsession doesn't last so long.

3. While the little girl was excellent, so were all the cast, particularly Arkin. And i found the scene between those two in the motel especially moving.

4. They should take out more than one mortgage so they can afford to fly to a beauty pageant? How do you know they don't already have a second mortgage, or a bad credit history. While the reasons they all go are contrived, so what? every Hitchcock movie ever made was contrived. Girl has to go, so mum has to, and grandpa trained her and dad wants to drive (and stop by scottsdale) and they cant leave a suicidal uncle behind, or a 15 year old boy - maybe you were left alone at 15 for days, but most kids aren't.

5. So they take the body with them, it's funny. To suggest only one directing team can pull this off is just silly, if its possible, its possible.

6. Carell's meeting with his nemesis - of course it's contrived, it's comedy, the scene is funny, it has no bearing on the rest of the film, so where's the problem?

7. You've totally misinterpreted the entire scene when they are pulled over. If anything is hard to believe it is the dad's quick transition from bumbling idiot who gives probable cause to search the trunk to the quick thinker who claims ownership of the mags. And I hardly think the gay porn joke is homophobic. There is not even a suggestion that the cop who pulls them over is homophobic, he leaves that particular mag behind but doesnt come down hard on the dad for having it. What is funny is that the cop misinterprets the dad's anxiety about what is in the trunk and then let's him go for sharing his taste in pornography.

8. I dont know about 'a la mode' i coulda translated it from french as Carell does, but i didn't know it came with a particular ice-cream - but again i think you've missed what's funny about the scene. The way the family team up against the father's opinion of what is the ideal figure for his daughter.

9. Again youve missed the point, the critique on 'America, America' as the song goes and it's hideous obsession with youth beauty pageants is what the end of the film - and the whole film - is about. The test is for the viewer to understand why the girl's dance angers the hosts and what that means.

10. And what a brave decision to have a horn stuck on annoying.

I enjoyed the film, I found faults, but hey were small. Indie used to be elitist, but now it is more commonly accepted and more widely viewed, there are those who feel the need to rise above it and a new level of elitism where nothing is good enough - not for the critic himself, who is far to humble, but for the masses the critic represents.

I pray for the time when hating the popular isn't all it takes to be cool.

 
On Sun Oct 08, 02:37:00 AM PDT, Blogger zak forrest articulated the following...

This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
On Sun Oct 08, 11:16:00 PM PDT, Blogger J. Ott articulated the following...

Wow,

Zak responded faster than I did.

I wouldn't be so harsh on Anonymous' opinions, Zak. There are a lot of people out there who simply love the movie, warts and all, and that's okay. I couldn't get into the movie, hated a lot of the choices that were made, and I describe precisely what and why. If you search the internet, you will find that there are plenty of other people out there like me, although not anywhere close to the number who liked Sunshine.

I'm part of the minority. But if my little review here is at least causing anonymous people to go back and take a more sober look at Sunshine, and really confirms that they enjoyed it, I can't be upset about that.

If Anonymous #3 really feels that the stuck horn was a "brave decision," there's nothing I can say that will make an atheist of him or her.

 
On Mon Oct 09, 04:02:00 AM PDT, Anonymous Anonymous articulated the following...

Hi. anonymous#3 here.

I'm not sure why you are getting so upset zak. The reason I'm an anonymus user is I can't be bothered to register a username.

And I'm not sure why you are even worrying yourself over a film you haven't seen.

movie's like this don't keep me sane, and they don't add to the insanity. It is JUST a movie. Some movies are more than that, they mean something and they change things. But LMS is just a movie, it made me laugh and I smiled throughout, and that's not a bad way to spend 90 minutes.

There were faults, things that aren't totally plausible, and plenty of cliches but nothing to get upset about, ans nothing that outweighs the enjoyable nature of the film.

A 'brave decision' is relative, in a film that will never change the world, a brave decision is something that might be funny, but might just annoy people. and a stuck horn is exactly that.

Now, I realise that the last 2 paragraphs of my first post were really badly written, and hard to read. It was late at night... I was trying to say...

I think there is a developing bandwagon for people who criticise alternative/indie tastes. Indie fans for generations have criticised mainstream movies and now that indie movies, with querky characters and plots have been going long enough for trends and conventions (and cliches) to develop, this bandwagon is becoming more popular. Its the in thing to spot psuedo-bohemia.

I dont have a problem with people not liking indie films, they are often slow and the humor is subtle. If you have different tastes that fine, I took a friend to watch LMS and he thought it was okay, he would have preffered to watch DOA or Miami Vice, but thats his taste and he's entitled to it.

What I dont like is this elitist attitude where nothing is good enough for your higher than everyone else's standards. I find the whole idea of having high standards pretentious. If I dont like a film, its because its not to my taste, not because my standards are too high - who is anyone to say that a film is fundemantally bad?

Alex.

 
On Mon Oct 09, 05:53:00 PM PDT, Blogger zak forrest articulated the following...

This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
On Tue Oct 10, 08:09:00 AM PDT, Blogger J. Ott articulated the following...

Alex,

I wish you and others wouldn't take my dislike of Sunshine so personally. You can like a movie while still admitting that it's bad. Or even if you don't want to admit Sunshine is on the derivative end of the indie spectrum, that's cool too.

I like to separate the wheat from the chaff to help me, as a filmmaker, clarify what techniques I should use and what stories I would like to tell. Hopefully it isn't so futile an exercise as the average internet critique.

I spent four years studying screenwriting intensely, learning to break down stories to their smallest constituents and reconstitute them as fun, fascinating films with consistent character motivations. When a movie has the frenzied success of Sunshine but demonstrates laziness and cliche in nearly every frame, it pains me. Not only is it as if the hundreds of people involved in making the film didn't care enough to give me their best, but that the general movie-going public doesn't care to demand the best from filmmakers. Which can only lead to more of the soul-less paint-by-numbers films that everyone agrees should never be made, but perpetuates by buying tickets to (the news Star Warses, por ejemplo).

 
On Wed Oct 11, 12:23:00 PM PDT, Anonymous Anonymous articulated the following...

hey john this is chad

LOVE YOUR REVIEW
action item list

Lmunicipal Mresidual Swaste

such a POS

 
On Wed Oct 11, 06:56:00 PM PDT, Blogger zak forrest articulated the following...

you're right, stanley kubrick was pretentious. high standards is for the birds.

both you and johns reactions are too complacent for m(my tastes)e, and remind me of a time when things never changed.


but seriously, can you explain to me what pretentious is and what it means specifically in this case? because i dont even understand when people say something or someone is being pretentious.

anyways we are all pretentious. talking to eachother like this on this board is the most pretentious thing ever. you telling me you think certain things are pretentious IS pretentious. i can see that clear as day, which is why i never think about it ever. so just the fact that you are gonna bring something like that up, and talk about something being pretentious, makes you the most pretentious of us all. hahahahahahaha

 
On Wed Oct 11, 06:59:00 PM PDT, Blogger zak forrest articulated the following...

This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
On Wed Oct 11, 11:35:00 PM PDT, Blogger zak forrest articulated the following...

This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
On Fri Oct 13, 01:56:00 AM PDT, Anonymous Anonymous articulated the following...

"I find the whole idea of having high standards pretentious. If I dont like a film, its because its not to my taste, not because my standards are too high - who is anyone to say that a film is fundemantally bad?".........
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHA
i hope whoever wrote this isnt a filmmaker or involved in anykind of creative process of anykind, if you look at why things are important why needing to laugh or have representation is important, sometimes 1+1=2, in fact it always does, things are good and bad for reasons, I think by pretentious you mean thinking maybe, thinking about how 1+1=2, not being lazy
Little miss sunshine fits into a history that is definite and present
to be a filmmaker and to talk about film, its talking about your lifes work, to be pretentious is to take your lifes work seriously
"work is the language of love" GODARD

 
On Sun Oct 15, 10:06:00 PM PDT, Anonymous Anonymous articulated the following...

tBy being a total asshole and so analytical of this film I believe that you have completely missed the point. Hate to burst your bubble but I felt like I should clue you in on that one.

 
On Mon Oct 16, 09:27:00 PM PDT, Blogger zak forrest articulated the following...

This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
On Fri Oct 20, 07:18:00 AM PDT, Blogger zak forrest articulated the following...

This post has been removed by the author.

 
On Fri Oct 27, 03:39:00 AM PDT, Blogger zak forrest articulated the following...

This post has been removed by the author.

 
On Wed Nov 01, 12:25:00 PM PST, Blogger zak forrest articulated the following...

This post has been removed by the author.

 
On Tue Dec 26, 10:06:00 PM PST, Anonymous Anonymous articulated the following...

You have nothing better to do than decide why you are to good for this movie. Maybe if you got that large protruding monkey out of your ass, you just might enjoy a film once in a while. It wasn't the best ever, but at least it was enjoyable. After all someone put hard work and effort into this film. Release a film that did better than I'd say you have room to talk.

 
On Sat Jan 20, 02:30:00 PM PST, Blogger zak articulated the following...

This post has been removed by the author.

 
On Sat Jan 20, 02:36:00 PM PST, Blogger zak articulated the following...

This post has been removed by the author.

 
On Sat Jan 20, 02:37:00 PM PST, Blogger zak articulated the following...

This post has been removed by the author.

 
On Fri Jan 26, 02:00:00 AM PST, Anonymous Anonymous articulated the following...

Who ever hates this movie.... lick my balls...

 

Post a Comment

Home |

728090b